Believe it or not, the Supreme Court of the United States just decided whether “to have ‘actual knowledge’ of a piece of information, one must in fact be aware of it.” The Court said “yes,” and it was unanimous. Most non-lawyers (and even some lawyers) would probably be surprised that this issue was even being
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rules That Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants Cannot Remove Class Actions Under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA)
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Class Action Fairness Act
The U.S. Supreme Court held today that a third-party defendant could not remove a class action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) because the term “defendant” as used in CAFA refers only to the party or parties sued by the original plaintiff. The Court’s opinion also has implications beyond the class…
Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert: Rule 23(f) Deadline Cannot Be Equitably Tolled
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Class Certification Standards
The Supreme Court ruled yesterday, in Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, that the 14-day deadline under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) for petitioning a court of appeals to hear a discretionary appeal from a class certification order cannot be equitably tolled. The district court had decertified the class. The plaintiff’s counsel expressed an intent…
SCOTUS to Decide Whether Class Action Counterclaims Can Be Removed Under Class Action Fairness Act
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Class Action Fairness Act
The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. v. Jackson, No. 17-1471 to decide whether a defendant to a class-action counterclaim can remove the case to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) where the jurisdictional requirements under CAFA are otherwise satisfied. At one level, the dispute involves…
Judge Kavanaugh on Class Actions
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Defense Strategy
With Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, one question to ask is whether, if he is confirmed, that will move the Court to any degree in class action cases. Unfortunately, we don’t have much to look at. The D.C. Circuit, with its small geographic footprint, is not a hotbed of class action filings.…
Sveen v. Melin: Supreme Court Speaks On the Contracts Clause
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Defense Strategy
After a decades-long drought, the Supreme Court recently decided a case involving the Contracts Clause of the Constitution. You might not recall that provision because it is so rarely invoked in modern-day litigation (due to how it has been construed). It provides that “[n]o state shall . . . pass . . . any Law…
China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh: Class Actions Toll Statutes of Limitations Only for Individual Suits
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Defense Strategy
Yesterday, in China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that, under its prior decision in American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974), the filing of a putative class action suit tolls the statutes of limitations only to allow individual, non-class suits to be filed after class…
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Class Action Arbitration Is Allowed Where Arbitration Clause Is Silent Regarding Availability of Class Proceedings
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Arbitration/Appraisal
The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Lamps Plus Inc. v. Varela, No. 17-988. The question presented in the petition for certiorari is: “Whether the Federal Arbitration Act forecloses a state-law interpretation of an arbitration agreement that would authorize class arbitration based solely on general language commonly used in arbitration agreements.”
The Court will…
Supreme Court to Address Use of Cy Pres Relief in Class Action Settlements Next Term
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Class Action Settlements
The Supreme Court recently granted review in a case that involves whether, or in what circumstances, cy pres relief may be used in class action settlements. In Frank v. Gaos, No. 17-961, the Court will review the Ninth Circuit’s decision in In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litig., 869 F.3d 737 (9th Cir.…
Oral Argument in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis: Class Action Waivers in Employment Agreements
By Wystan Ackerman on
Posted in Arbitration/Appraisal
The Supreme Court began its new Term yesterday with oral arguments in cases involving whether arbitration agreements permitting only individual (non-class) arbitrations are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, or prohibited by the National Labor Relations Act as an improper restriction on collective action. It is a case that essentially pits one federal statute against…