Yesterday the Second Circuit reversed the approval of what was reportedly the largest antitrust class action settlement in history, valued at $7.25 billion. In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12047 (2d Cir. June 30, 2016). The case was brought by merchants who challenged the fees and … Continue Reading
A recent Florida appellate court decision caught my eye because it addressed a potentially-important issue that is not expressly addressed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, and has rarely been litigated: whether persons who have opted out of a class action settlement may pursue another class action on the same claims. The court held that … Continue Reading
Defendants who are defending multiple class actions involving the same issue in different jurisdictions can sometimes be faced with a quandary when they want to settle. They might reach a settlement agreement with plaintiffs’ counsel in one of the cases, but until that settlement is final, which typically takes months, they may have to continue … Continue Reading
Over the last several years, federal courts of appeals have been closely scrutinizing cy pres distributions to charitable organizations in class action settlements. This includes opinions by the First Circuit, Third Circuit and Ninth Circuit. The general thrust of these decisions is that cy pres should be used sparingly, and the charitable organization should be … Continue Reading
A recent Ninth Circuit decision caught my eye. It addressed whether a state enforcement action can be barred by a class action settlement on the same issue, finding that it was barred in part, to the extent the suit sought restitution that was the same relief at issue in the class action. In People v. … Continue Reading
Judge Posner of the Seventh Circuit continues to be prolific in authoring class action-related opinions. I enjoy blogging about these decisions because they are entertaining to read and usually relatively short and to the point, making them easy to get through and summarize here. This opinion, once again, concluded that an award of attorneys’ fees … Continue Reading
Judge Posner of the Seventh Circuit is a frequent author of class action-related opinions. His most recent one reversed an order approving a class action settlement because the attorneys’ fee award was too high. The case involved claims that RadioShack violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act by putting expiration dates for credit card … Continue Reading
One of the prominent cases in which a products liability class action has been certified in recent years is Pella Corp. v. Saltzman, 606 F.3d 391 (7th Cir. 2010), involving windows that allegedly contained a design defect that allowed water infiltration. After the class was certified, a settlement was reached and approved by the federal … Continue Reading
Some loyal readers of my blog may recall my June 8, 2011 blog post about the district court’s approval of the class action settlement in In re Dry Max Pampers Litigation. This case alleged that Pampers “Dry Max” diapers purportedly caused excessive diaper rash. Both the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission and Health Canada investigated … Continue Reading
Under the coupon settlement provision of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), do attorneys’ fees always have to be based on the value of the coupons redeemed, or can they be based on a lodestar calculation? The Ninth Circuit recently addressed this question and held, in a 2-1 decision, that any award of fees “attributable … Continue Reading
Last week the Ninth Circuit issued a decision reversing the district court’s approval of a class action settlement, based on a provision in the agreement that, as interpreted by the court, required the class representatives to support the proposed settlement in order to qualify for receiving an incentive award. The court concluded that this presented … Continue Reading
Objectors to class action settlements often argue that the proposed settlement is really benefiting the plaintiffs’ lawyers and not the class. It’s less common to see an argument that a settlement is benefiting the named plaintiffs at the expense of the class they are representing. The Sixth Circuit recently found such a problem, and reversed … Continue Reading
Last week the Third Circuit issued its first opinion on the subject of cy pres relief (i.e., distributions to charity instead of directly to class members) in class action settlements. There have been several federal appellate decisions over the last year on this issue. These decisions have suggested a need for greater scrutiny of cy … Continue Reading
A recent 4-3 decision by the Montana Supreme Court allows objectors to a class action settlement to take fairly broad discovery regarding the terms of the settlement, potentially including deposing class counsel regarding the negotiations and mediation, notwithstanding a Montana statute providing for confidentiality of mediations. This decision demonstrates the importance of recognizing that, although … Continue Reading
In my July 19, 2012 blog post, I wrote about the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Dennis v. Kellogg Company, 687 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 2012). Last week, however, the Ninth Circuit withdrew its previous opinion and substituted a new opinion – Dennis v. Kellogg Company, Nos. 11-55674 and 11-55706, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18576 (9th … Continue Reading
One important distinction that Rule 23 makes between different types of class actions is that the rule does not require notice to the class or an opportunity to opt out for 23(b)(1) and (b)(2) classes, but notice and an opportunity to opt out are required for 23(b)(3) classes. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(A), (B). … Continue Reading
Over the last year or so, several circuits have reversed the approval of class action settlements, particularly where they found problems with cy pres awards and attorneys’ fee awards. (For a quick snapshot of recent trends in this area, skim through the Class Action Settlements page of my blog.) The courts of appeals have emphasized … Continue Reading
Last week, in In re Lupron Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, Nos. 10-2494, 11-1329, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8263 (1st Cir. Apr. 24, 2012), the First Circuit issued a significant opinion providing substantial guidance on distribution of excess funds in a class action settlement on a cy pres basis. This situation typically occurs when there … Continue Reading
Insurance companies often view class actions as meritless suits driven by plaintiffs’ lawyers and perhaps one or two disgruntled insureds. But they often want to resolve small disputes with their customers, and give insureds the benefit of the doubt. After all, keeping insureds happy and retaining their business year after year is very important. So … Continue Reading
The Ninth Circuit recently vacated the approval of a class action settlement where the class received non-monetary relief and $100,000 of cy pres awards, and class counsel was awarded $800,000 in attorneys’ fees. The Center for Class Action Fairness objected, focusing on the size of the attorneys’ fees award in comparison to the benefit to … Continue Reading
On August 5th, Farmers Insurance announced a settlement of a nationwide class action in the District Court of Canadian County, Oklahoma, involving med-pay and PIP (personal injury protection) benefits under auto insurance policies. It was reported in a number of media sources, including the Insurance Journal. A class had been certified and the certification affirmed … Continue Reading
When a federal court grants preliminary approval to a proposed class action settlement, can it enjoin parallel state court proceedings while the notice and final approval process take place? Judge Fallon of the Eastern District of Louisiana recently found such an injunction appropriate in In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue Reading
I found very interesting a recent post by Russell Jackson on his Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts Blog, discussing a proposed settlement in In re Dry Max Pampers Litigation, which includes a ban on future class actions. This MDL involved claims that Dry Max diapers, a relatively new product introduced by Pampers, purportedly caused … Continue Reading
A recent article in the Los Angeles Times regarding a class action settlement by Farmers Insurance suggests that there is something improper about a class settlement that requires class members to submit a form under penalty of perjury, and allowing money that is not paid out to revert to the insurer: Here’s how to make … Continue Reading
